Fabrički opozivi

Iskustva sa servisima, cene održavanja, pranje i poliranje
Korisnikov avatar
trojanac
Editor in Chief
Postovi: 24935
Pridružio se: 06 Jan 2012, 11:39
Garaža: Honda Civic EU8 1.6 VTEC
Lokacija: Beograd
Kontakt:

Re: Fabrički opozivi

Post od trojanac » 05 Jul 2015, 09:27

Spisak automobila, koji mogu biti opremljeni problematičnim Takata vazdušnim jastucima:
Acura TL, CL i MDX proizvedeni u periodu od 2002. do 2006. godine
BMW serije 3 E46 sedan, Touring, Coupe i Carbio (1999 - 2006), procenjuje se da ih ima oko 765.000
Chrysler 300 (2003. - 2008.) i Dodge Ram (2002. - 2008.), ukupno iz koncerna Chrysler oko 2.880.000 vozila
Ford Ranger (2003 - 2005), Ford GT (2005 - 2006) i Ford Mustang (2004 - 2008), ukupno 538.977 vozila
Honda i Acura, pre svih modeli Accord (2001 - 2007), Civic (2001 - 2005), CR-V (2002 - 2006), Odyssey (2002 - 2004), Element (2003 - 2011) i Pilot (2003 - 2007), preko 5,4 miliona vozila
Infiniti I30, I35, QX4, FX35, FX45, M35 i M45 (2001 - 2006)
Lexus SC430 (2002 - 2005)
Mazda 6, Mazda RX-8, Mazda MPV i Mazda serije B (2004 - 2008), ukupno oko 330.000 auta
Mitsubishi Lancer i Rider (2004 - 2007), oko 12.000 vozila
Nissan Maxima, Pathfinder i Sentra (2001 - 2006), ukupno 717.364 vozila
Pontiac Vibe (2003 - 2005)
Saab 9-2X iz 2005. godine
Subaru Baja, Legacy i Outback (2003-2005) i Impreza, WRX i WRX STI (2004 - 2005), oko 17.516 primeraka
Toyota Corolla i Sequoia (2002 - 2005), Matrix i Tundra (2003 - 2005), oko 877 000 automobila.



http://www.automagazin.rs/saveti/16124/ ... -jastucima


I moj Civic je na spisku. Proveriću narednih dana u Delti da li znaju nešto o tome i probati da utvrdim da li podležem opozivu.
Posetite Garaža blog !

Korisnikov avatar
Geza
Moderator
Postovi: 31075
Pridružio se: 06 Jan 2012, 11:49
Lokacija: Apsurdistan

Re: Fabrički opozivi

Post od Geza » 11 Okt 2015, 20:27

Malo istorije. Audi 5000 u Americi i problemi sa iznenadnim ubrzanjem.
In 1982 and 1983, Volkswagen of America (VWoA) twice recalled 1978-83 Audi 5000 cars with automatic transmissions in the U.S. and Canada in response to reports of sudden acceleration after shifts out of park accompanied by inability of brakes to stop the vehicle. A third recall covering 1978-86 models, first announced by VWoA in August 1986 as a service action for 1984-86 models and then as a safety recall in January 1987 for all 1978-86 models (87V-008), attempted to fix the sudden acceleration problem by installing a transmission interlock. Neither of the first two recalls fixed a mechanical problem; the first (82V-037) addressed floor mat interference with the accelerator, while the second (83V-095) concerned the possibility that drivers might accidentally hit the accelerator pedal while braking. VWoA said in 1983 that it knew of 264 accidents, including 48 injuries, from inadvertent acceleration in 1978-83 5000's.
Since 1983, hundreds of new accidents have occurred involving either 1984-86 Audi 5000 cars or 1978-83 models already recalled. In all, nearly 700 Audi 5000 sudden acceleration accidents have been reported, meaning that nearly 1 out of 500 Audi 5000 automatics has already had a runaway accident. At least 6 people have been killed in Audi sudden acceleration accidents.
In 1985, responding to a request from the Center, DOT's National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) wrote VWoA about sudden acceleration accidents in 1984-85 Audi 5000s. VWoA wrote NHTSA on January 14, 1986, that it had received nearly 70 accident reports on those models alone, which it blamed on driver error. However, the Center said despite VWoA's official position, the company has on numerous occasions replaced damaged runaway Audis with new cars or paid for property damage.
New York Attorney General Robert Abrams and the Center for Auto Safety on March 19, 1986, petitioned the U.S. Department of Transportation to recall 300,000 1978-86 Audi 5000 cars which suddenly accelerate after shifts out of "Park." Joining in the petition were the New York Public Interest Research Group and a group of Audi accident victims in the New York City area, where half the reported runaway Audi accidents have occurred.
Following the Center's petition, NHTSA expanded its low-level probe of runaway Audi's to include all 1978-86 models with automatic transmission. VWoA, acknowledging sales declines in the Northeast of 15% for the Audi 5000, initially announced plans in May 1986 to conduct a "service campaign" to correct a problem of drivers "inadvertently" pressing the accelerator when intending to brake.
VWoA's service campaign proposed moving the brake and accelerator pedals farther apart in the 1984-86 model 5000's. However the plan, announced before a meeting of over 150 angry Audi 5000 owners and accident victims, was denounced by the newly formed Audi Victims Network. Under growing pressure from owners and attorneys general offices (Illinois Attorney General Neil Hartigan had since also petitioned NHTSA to investigate and recall the runaway Audi's), VWoA dropped its planned service campaign and announced instead in August 1986 that it would install a transmission interlock device requiring the driver to depress the brake in order to shift out of Park. This service campaign, originally announced for 1984-86 models only, was later extended to all 1978-86 5000 automatics.
Despite VWoA's service campaign, NHTSA on August 15, 1986, announced the opening of a formal investigation into sudden acceleration on the 1978-86 Audi 5000.
Then on November 23, 1986, CBS News' "60 Minutes" program broadcast "Out of Control," a segment on the Audi 5000 sudden acceleration problem. The program contrasted tragic accounts of Audi accident victims with statements from company spokespersons insisting that accidents were due to driver error. CBS also used interviews with private engineers who had developed theories about how problems with the Audi's transmission and electronic idle stabilizer valves could cause the car to self-accelerate. In addition, CBS featured charges by the Center that Audi was running a "secret recall" in the form of a service campaign to replace defective idle stabilizer valves. (See NHTSA recall summary below for 86V-103 where NHTSA points out that as part of recall to prevent engine compartment fires, Audi was replacing the idle stabilizer valve with no reason given.) Finally, CBS reported on three sudden acceleration accidents that had occurred in Audi's with the company's "shift lock" device.
Audi sales, which had already dropped about 20% following publicity of the Center's petition, plummeted by 60% after CBS' "60 Minutes" broadcast aired. The company was also under fire outside the U.S. as reports of "runaway Audi's" came in from Canada and Europe. Audi ultimately extended its "shift lock" recall to Canada and Sweden, where fatal "runaway Audi" accidents had occurred.
In December, with Audi sales still reeling, NHTSA offered the company a way out. In a recall "request" issued to VWoA December 23, 1986, NHTSA suggested that the two Audi service campaigns to replace idle stabilizers and install shift locks be relabeled as safety recalls. NHTSA appeared to embrace Audi's "driver error" theory, theorizing in its recall request letter that owners might be startled by a high idle condition into making a "pedal placement error."
VWoA and Audi agreed in January to comply with NHTSA's request to relabel its service programs as safety recalls covering 250,000 1978-86 Audi 5000's with automatic transmissions. Though the recalls came under sharp attack from the Illinois Attorney General, the Audi Victims Network and the Center, which noted that "sudden acceleration" accidents had already occurred in Audi's with the shift lock, NHTSA praised Audi's action and predicted it would "reduce" the number of Audi acceleration accidents. Later NHTSA Administrator Diane Steed wrote the Center, calling it "irresponsible" for attacking VWoA's recall.
But Audi's and VWoA's troubles were not over. On January 15, 1987 VWoA provided to NHTSA for the first time all the acceleration complaints it had received on the Audi 5000, sending the accident toll past 1600, including 400 injuries. On May 15, 1987, responding to a NHTSA "technical review" of a defect petition filed by the Center, VWoA agreed to recall 25,000 1985-86 Audi 4000, Audi GT and VW Quantum cars with the same five-cylinder engine as the Audi 5000, to replace defective idle stabilizer valves. (87V-069.)
But Audi's solution to apparent unintended acceleration was not remedied by installation of the shift lock device in its recall; by mid-summer of 1987, Audi owners reported over 100 incidents of unintended acceleration on Audi 5000s with a shift lock device. The New York Public Interest Research Group (NYPRIG) published a 190 page report, Shifting the Blame: A Report on Sudden Acceleration in the Audi 5000, in July of 1987, citing 125 such incidents. This report was cited by fifteen members of Congress and forwarded to DOT Secretary Elizabeth Dole, along with a letter criticizing the ineffectiveness of the recall and calling for stronger action.
In response to the controversy surrounding the Audi 5000, two class actions were filed in 1987 against Volkswagen of America, Inc. (VWoA), Audi's parent company. (Nos. 87 CH 02076 and 87 CH 02234, both filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Chicago, Illinois.) These actions were consolidated, and a proposed class action settlement was reached between class counsel and VWoA. Under the terms of the settlement, past and present owners and lessees of model years 1978-1986 would be entitled to a cash certificate ranging in value from $300-$2000, good only when applied against purchase of a new Audi. Although Judge Harold Seigan initially approved the settlement, he recused himself after receiving objections from the Center for Auto Safety, the Audi Victims Network, and NYPIRG, and hundreds of other class members. Judge Thomas R. Rakowski vacated the proposed settlement on August 11, 1988, citing, among other grounds, the unfairness to class members of having to purchase a new Audi to receive any compensation.
In July 1992, Circuit Court Judge Bischke of Cook County Court dismissed the fifth amended complaint in the Audi 5000 sudden acceleration class action originally filed in 1987, Case No. 87-02076. This began a long and tortuous appeals process. First, the Illinois Court of Appeals reversed the dismissal of the fifth amended complaint and remanded the matter to the trial court for further proceedings. Perona v. Volkswagen of America, 276 Ill.App.3d 609, 213 Ill.Dec. 328, 658 N.E.2d 1349 (1995). During the pendency of a Petition for Leave to Appeal, the Illinois Supreme Court issued an opinion in Connick v. Suzuki Motor Co., 174 Ill.2d 482, 221 Ill.Dec. 389, 675 N.E.2d 584 (1996), then vacated Perona, 276 Ill.App.3d 609, 213 Ill.Dec. 328, 658 N.E.2d 1349 and remanded it for reconsideration in light of the Connick opinion. This time the Illinois Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal of the UCC and Magnuson-Moss claims but reversed the dismissal of the Consumer Fraud Act claims and remanded the case to the trial court for further proceedings. Perona v. Volkswagen of America, 292 Ill.App.3d 59, 684 N.E.2d 859 (Ill.App. 1 Dist.,1997). Plaintiffs then filed a sixth amended complaint and defendants sought to remove the case to Federal district court under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 and on diversity. On June 1, 2006, the US District Court for Northern District of Illinois ruled that removal was improper and remanded it once again to the Circuit Court of Cook County for trial (2006 WL 1543752 (N.D.Ill.)) where it stands in October 2009 over 22 years after first being filed.
The phenomenon of sudden acceleration has drawn the attention of scientists around the world. Immediately following the Audi 5000 investigation in the US, several studies by various government agencies have tried but failed to resolve the cause of sudden acceleration. The only study to pinpoint a specific defect within the vehicle, "Risk Assessment of Cruise Control," by Mats Gunnerhed, was conducted by the Swedish Defense Research Establishment of the Department of Information Technology. Issued in May of 1988, it concluded that within certain types of cruise control systems "there is a single-point-fault mode that leads to sudden acceleration at high power." The specific fault pointed out by the Swedish agency was a "bad solder joint" in the Hella cruise control used on 1981-83 Audis. All of the Audis experiencing sudden acceleration which are the subject of the class action were with cruise control systems.
Transport Canada, the Canadian equivalent of the Department of Transportation, issued a report entitled, "Investigation of Sudden Acceleration Incidents" in December, 1988, concluding driver error caused the phenomenon. Another study which could not determine the cause of sudden acceleration was "An Investigation on Sudden Starting and/or Acceleration of Vehicles with Automatic Transmissions," conducted by the Japanese Ministry of Transport and released April 27, 1989. It found no common mechanical cause for sudden acceleration, which it analyzed it conjunction with simultaneous brake failure.
The study conducted by NHTSA, "An Examination of Sudden Acceleration," drew a conclusion similar to that of the Canadian report, but emphasized human factors design errors in the layout of vehicle controls in the driver compartment of cars found to have high sudden acceleration rates. The NHTSA study is small solace for Audi in defense of product liability actions, as more and more successful cases used Audi's human factor design errors and failure to warn or recall as a basis for liability. The NHTSA study also found but failed to highlight that faulty cruise control systems can cause wide open throttle acceleration, and that cars with full acceleration take an average of 65 feet to stop. This report was released March 7, 1989. NHTSA officially closed its investigation of sudden acceleration in the Audi 5000 on July 11, 1989. (Investigative Report ODI Case No. C86-01.) In closing the investigation, one factor NHTSA relied upon was the fact that there had been three recalls and a service campaign attempting to correct the human factors design errors; 87V-008, 87V-009, and 87V-170. None of these recalls eliminated sudden acceleration in the Audi 5000.

http://www.autosafety.org/audi-sudden-acceleration
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=otyax6onMWw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eAwuto6Umo
Najgore je svađati se sa budalom. Prvo te spusti na svoj nivo, a onda te dotuče iskustvom...
Slika Slika

Korisnikov avatar
Geza
Moderator
Postovi: 31075
Pridružio se: 06 Jan 2012, 11:49
Lokacija: Apsurdistan

Re: Fabrički opozivi

Post od Geza » 24 Mar 2016, 20:04

VW kola širom sveta imaju novi problem
http://www.b92.net/biz/vesti/svet.php?y ... id=1111740

Frankfurt -- Nemačka automobilska kompanija Folksvagen (VW) će opozvati 800.000 vozila širom sveta zbog potencijalnog kvara na mehanizmu pedala.

Opoziv se odnosi na 391.000 vozila marke "tuareg" i na preko 400.000 modela "porše kajen" proizvedenih u periodu od 2011. godine do 2016. godine, prenosi agencija Frans pres.

Inače, američke vlasti su produžile rok VW-u do 21. aprila za dostavljanje plana popravke oko 600.000 vozila u SAD, kod kojih je ustanovljena viši nivo emisije zagađujućih gasova od dozvoljenog zakonom, zbog instaliranog "prevarantskog" softvera.

Produženje je usledilo pošto je danas istekao ranije utvrđen rok za dostavu takvog plana.

VW je, takođe, suočen sa tužbom američkog ministarstva pravde, koje je u januaru optužilo nemačku kompaniju za kršenje zakona o zaštiti životne sredine.

Nemačka kompanija je još u septembru prošle godine priznala postojanje "prevarantskog" softvera u svojim automobilima, koji umanjuje emisiju toksičnog azotnog oksida tokom laboratorijskih testova.

Međutim, prilikom vožnje na otvorenom putu, softver dozvoljava emisiju štetnih gasova koja je do 40 odsto veća od dozvoljene.
Najgore je svađati se sa budalom. Prvo te spusti na svoj nivo, a onda te dotuče iskustvom...
Slika Slika

Korisnikov avatar
shandu90
Postovi: 8330
Pridružio se: 22 Jan 2016, 23:13
Garaža: Astra G 1.4 Twinport
Lokacija: Novi Sad

Re: Fabrički opozivi

Post od shandu90 » 24 Mar 2016, 20:16

Bravo bravo

Sent from my LG-H440n using Tapatalk

Korisnikov avatar
Geza
Moderator
Postovi: 31075
Pridružio se: 06 Jan 2012, 11:49
Lokacija: Apsurdistan

Re: Fabrički opozivi

Post od Geza » 05 Apr 2016, 22:41

"MERCEDESI" S GREŠKOM I NA SRPSKIM PUTEVIMA?! Nemački proizvođač opozvao desetine modela zbog FABRIČKIH PROPUSTA!
http://www.informer.rs/vesti/zastitnik- ... H-PROPUSTA

Postoji mogućnost da su se neispravni automobili našli i našem tržištu, a kako navodi ovlašćeni zastupnik "Dajmlera" u Srbiji, greške na pojedinim modelima mogu izazvati kako povrede, tako i požare

Pri svakoj poseti ovlašćenoj servisnoj mreži, bez obzira na zemlju porekla vozila, proverava se da li postoje otvorene servisne mere ili opozivi za to vozilo

Svakom ko je u mogućnosti da sebi priušti udoban, izdržljiv i siguran automobil bez sumnje će jedan od prvih izbora biti "mercedes". Međutim, čuveni nemački proizvođač automobila na tržište je izbacio na desetine modela koji u sebi imaju fabričku grešku i pozvao kupce da se obrate ovlašćenom dileru kod kog je vozilo kupljeno.

Neispravni "mercedesi" su se našli i na našem tržištu, te je generalni zastupnik "Dajmlera" u Srbiji "Star import" na zvaničnom sajtu Ministarstva trgovine nepro.gov.rs, na kome se oglašavaju nebezbedni proizvodi, oglasio sve sporne modele navodeći koji su sve rizici kada se voze sporni automobili. Među njima su najčešći rizici od povreda, ali i od požara. To je učinjeno čak 15 puta u poslednjih godinu dana.

U pitanju su "mercedesi" A, B, C i E klase, i to po više različitih modela.

U "Star importu" su nam objasnili da se "nakon dobijanja informacija od proizvođača o opozivu u vezi sa potencijalnim rizikom ili posledicama po bezbednost, kontaktira s vlasnicima svih vozila koja su obuhvaćena opozivom radi dolaska u ovlašćene servise radi kontrole i eventualnih prepravki na vozilu u slučaju potrebe".

ŠOKANTNO ISKUSTVO BEOGRAĐANINA: Dao 300.000 evra za tri BMW-a, SVA TRI CRKLA!
Savet vlasnicima: Poslušajte vašeg dilera

Darko Gigić iz SAT revije objašnjava da nije nužno da se sporna vozila nalaze i kod srpskih kupaca, ali da velike i odgovorne kompanije u većini slučajeva obaveste svoje kupce o potencijalnoj opasnosti na svim teritorijama gde se njihova vozila prodaju.
- Vlasnici spornih automobila, kada ih diler od koga su kupili vozilo pozove, treba da poslušaju njegov savet. U zavisnosti od kvara, dobiće savet ili da se odmah jave ovlašćenom servisu kako bi njihovo vozilo bilo provereno ili će prilikom redovnog servisa sporni deo biti proveren i ako je potrebno, zamenjen - kaže Gigić.

- Podaci o bezbednosnim opozivima za vozila "mercedes-benc", "smart", FUSO i "setra" na portalu http://www.nepro.gov.rs ažuriraju se u skladu sa obaveštenjima koja "Star import" kao generalni distributer pomenutih brendova šalje Ministarstvu za trgovinu i telekomunikacije, a prema informacijama dobijenim od strane proizvođača. Budući da podatke o korisnicima ili vlasnicima poseduju naši ovlašćeni servisni ili prodajni partneri, oni šalju do tri pozivna pisma u slučaju da klijent ne doveze vozilo na pregled ili prepravku nakon prvog poziva. U pozivnim pismima se jasno navodi zašto se opoziv objavljuje i kakve su moguće posledice neizvršavanja kontrole ili eventualnih prepravki od strane proizvođača - kaže Ozren Đurašević, PR "Star importa".

Kako kaže, stupa se u kontakt ne samo s vlasnicima vozila koja su prodata kroz ovlašćenu mrežu, već i s vlasnicima onih za koja proizvođač poseduje informaciju da se nalaze na našem tržištu.
I "Folksvagen" povlači automobile

Nemačka automobilska kompanija "Folksvagen" opozvaće 800.000 vozila širom sveta zbog potencijalnog kvara na mehanizmu pedala. Opoziv se odnosi na 391.000 vozila marke "tuareg" i na preko 400.000 modela "porše kajena" proizvedenih u periodu od 2011. do 2016. godine.

- Takođe, pri svakoj poseti ovlašćenoj servisnoj mreži, bez obzira na zemlju porekla vozila proverava se da li postoje otvorene servisne mere ili opozivi za to vozilo, i u slučaju postojanja, izvršavaju se u dogovoru s klijentom.

Na pitanje koliko je takvih vozila na srpskom tržištu, Đurašević kaže:

- U pojedinim opozivima, iako se u nazivu opoziva navodi da se može raditi o većem broju modela, to ne znači da se na tržištu nalaze vozila koja su obuhvaćena tim opozivom ili da ih ima mnogo.

SPISAK SPORNIH "MERCEDESA"

1. Na vozilima marke "smart", oznaka modela 453, proizvedenim između aprila i novembra 2014. postoji mogućnost da var na nosaču torzione opruge na amortizeru nije ispravno izveden što može dovesti do kidanja šava vara. Kao posledica toga može doći do pogoršanja voznih karakteristika vozila, tendencije vozila ka kotrljanju, oštećenja pneumatika pri zakretanju pod velikim uglovima upravljača i saobraćajne nezgode.
Rizik od povreda

2. Na vozilima "mercedes-benc" modeli A, GLA, CLA, B, CLK, C, E, CLS klasa, oznaka modela 117, 156, 176, 246, 172, 205, 207, 212, 218, sa motorima OM-651 može doći do pojave naprslina na cevima visokog pritiska sistema za ubrizgavanje goriva što kao rezultat može imati curenje goriva. U slučajevima prisustva izvora vatre može doći do pojave požara.
Rizik od požara

3. Na vozilima "mercedes-benc", model GLE kupe, ML, oznaka modela 166, 292 postoji mogućnost da je prirubnica stacionarnog grejača na vrhu modula za napajanje gorivom suviše kratka, što prouzrokuje da veza između njih nije dovoljno zaptivena, pa može dovesti do curenja goriva i pojave požara u blizini izvora vatre.
Rizik od požara

4. Na vozilima marke "mercedes-benc", model C klasa, oznaka modela 205 kapacitet logičke memorije sistema električnog sistema upravljanja može biti nedovoljan u najnepovoljnijim slučajevima. To može dovesti do deaktiviranja pomoćnog električnog servo sistema upravljanja što u kombinaciji sa većim silama na točku upravljača, u zavisnosti od uslova vožnje, može dovesti do nezgode/povrede korisnika.
Rizik od povreda

5. Na vozilima "mercedes-benc", model "sprinter", oznaka modela 906 postoji mogućnost da su ugrađeni vodovi visokog pritiska goriva koji su proizvedeni van traženih specifikacija. Zbog toga tokom eksploatacije može doći do pojave naprslina na vodovima i curenja goriva. Prisustvo goriva blizu izvora paljenja može dovesti do pojave požara.
Rizik od požara

6. Stopa kabla mase na nosaču motora automobila "mercedes-benc", model "atego", oznaka modela 967 previše je zategnuta zavrtnjem nosača motora i može pući usled vibracija i oscilacija motora usled čega vozilo može ostati bez napajanja, što može dovesti do nepravilnog rada instrument-table, osvetljenja, sistema za upozoravanje i motora. Navedene nepravilnosti mogu da dovedu do saobraćajne nezgode i povreda učesnika u saobraćaju.
Rizik od povreda

7. Na vozilima "smart for tu 453" postoji mogućnost da se sajla za položaj parkiranja ručice transmisije koja se proteže od modula birača do transmisije ne aktivira ispravno usled nosača koji nije po specifikaciji. U slučaju neispravnog aktiviranja, dovođenje u položaj "P" ručice birača neće biti ispravno preneto do transmisije preko sajle. Ukoliko vozilo nije pravilno obezbeđeno parkirnom kočnicom, može doći do neplaniranog pomeranja vozila i nezgode.
Rizik od povreda
Promo

8. Na vozilima marke "smart" oznake modela 453 sa transmisijom i dualnim kvačilom, proizvedenim između aprila i maja 2015, postoji mogućnost da radna brava ručne birača usled softverske greške u izolovanim slučajevima ne vrši funkciju ispravno. Ukoliko ručica birača nije u položaju "P" kada se ključ pomeri sa položaja "ON", može se privremeno pomeriti, bez pritiskanja pedale kočnice i bez ključa u položaju "ON". U tom slučaju postoji mogućnost da vozilo počne da se kreće, čak i bez namere vozača, ukoliko nije pravilno zakočeno parkirnom kočnicom.
Rizik od povreda

9. Na obuhvaćenim vozilima marke "smart for tu" oznake modela 453 s transmisijom i dvostrukim kvačilom softver kontrolne jedinice motora nije ažuriran ispravno, tako da postoji mogućnost da kontrolna jedinica motora nepravilno detektuje zahtev za obrtnim momentom tokom promene brzine. Tokom vožnje to može dovesti do ubrzavanja ili usporavanja vozila na način koji se ne podudara sa zahtevom vozača.
Rizik od povreda

10. Na obuhvaćenim vozilima "smart", model 453 s transmisijom i dvostrukim kvačilom softver kontrolne jedinice motora nije ažuriran ispravno, tako da postoji mogućnost da kontrolna jedinica motora nepravilno detektuje zahtev za obrtnim momentom tokom promene brzine. U takvim slučajevima može doći do ubrzavanja na takav način koji se ne podudara sa zahtevom vozača, što može dovesti do pojave kritične situacije u vožnji i povreda.
Rizik od povreda

11. Na nosačima naslona za glavu na vozilima "mercedes-benc" GL klase, oznake modela X-166 kontura geometrije zareza nije izrađena dovoljno što može prouzrokovati da naslon za glavu ne ostane na svom mestu prilikom dejstva velikih sila koje deluju odozgo. U posebnim uslovima nezgode postoji povećan rizik od povrede putnika na levom i desnom sedištu u drugom redu.
Rizik od povreda

12. Na vozilima "mercedes-benc" E klase i CIS klase, oznake modela 628 postoji mogućnost da zaptivka motornog prostora nije ispravno učvršćena tokom proizvodnje. Zaptivka se može zalepiti na poklopac motornog prostora i njen kraj može delimično da padne u prostor između motora i pregradnog zida. Takvim položajem ona se naslanja na vreo katalitički konvertor i može da izazove požar.
Rizik od požara

13. Na automobilu "mercedes-benc" model "sprinter", oznaka modela 906, s motorom OM-651 prstenasta zaptivka zatezača lanca motora može neispravno nalegati i prouzrokovati gubitak ulja, što vremenom može dovesti do odvajanja zatezača lanca od ležišta u glavi motora. Gubitak veće količine ulja može dovesti do kontaminacije površine puta i potencijalne opasnosti po saobraćaj.
Rizik od povreda

14. Na automobilima "mercedes-benz", model "nov vito", "vijano", "vito" i "V-klasa", oznaka modela 639, 447 sa motorom OM-651 prstenasta zaptivka zatezača lanaca motora može neispravno nalegati i prouzorkovati gubitak ulja što vremenom može dovesti do odvajanja zatezača lanca od ležišta u glavi motora. Gubitak veće količine ulja može dovesti do kontaminacije površine puta i potencijalne opasnosti po saobraćaj.
Rizik od povreda

15. Na automobilima "mercedes-benc", modeli A, B, C, CLA, CLS, E, GLA, ML, S, SLK klasa, proizvedenim između 24. 6. 2008. i 10. 12. 2014, oznaka modela 176, 246, 204, 205, 117, 218, 207, 212, 156, 204, 166, 221, 222 i 172 prstenasta zaptivka zatezača lanca motora može neispravno nalegati. Vremenom to može dovesti do odvajanja zatezača lanca od ležišta u glavi motora i gubitka ulja. Gubitak veće količine ulja može dovesti do kontaminacije površine puta i potencijalne opasnosti po saobraćaj.
Rizik od povreda
Najgore je svađati se sa budalom. Prvo te spusti na svoj nivo, a onda te dotuče iskustvom...
Slika Slika

Korisnikov avatar
Delija
Postovi: 17923
Pridružio se: 13 Jan 2012, 08:48
Garaža: plava munja
Lokacija: NS
Kontakt:

Re: Fabrički opozivi

Post od Delija » 05 Apr 2016, 22:45

Geza je napisao:ŠOKANTNO ISKUSTVO BEOGRAĐANINA: Dao 300.000 evra za tri BMW-a, SVA TRI CRKLA!
A, bre, Gezo, ne kopira se sa Ctrl + A :mrgreen:
Bahati vozac BMW-a

Korisnikov avatar
Geza
Moderator
Postovi: 31075
Pridružio se: 06 Jan 2012, 11:49
Lokacija: Apsurdistan

Re: Fabrički opozivi

Post od Geza » 05 Apr 2016, 22:53

Ja sam samo glasnik, oblik vesti stvara neko drugi. :)
Najgore je svađati se sa budalom. Prvo te spusti na svoj nivo, a onda te dotuče iskustvom...
Slika Slika

Korisnikov avatar
Delija
Postovi: 17923
Pridružio se: 13 Jan 2012, 08:48
Garaža: plava munja
Lokacija: NS
Kontakt:

Re: Fabrički opozivi

Post od Delija » 05 Apr 2016, 23:06

Pa to je link na drugi clanak u sred teksta :)
Bahati vozac BMW-a

Korisnikov avatar
Geza
Moderator
Postovi: 31075
Pridružio se: 06 Jan 2012, 11:49
Lokacija: Apsurdistan

Re: Fabrički opozivi

Post od Geza » 06 Apr 2016, 00:03

Puno cepidlačiš od kada si prešao u plavi auto... Slika Idi daj žmigavac na nekoj raskrsnici. Slika
Najgore je svađati se sa budalom. Prvo te spusti na svoj nivo, a onda te dotuče iskustvom...
Slika Slika

Korisnikov avatar
grujicd
Postovi: 6037
Pridružio se: 16 Jan 2012, 13:32
Garaža: Honda Jazz 1.4 2007 & CR-V 2.0 2012
Lokacija: Beograd

Re: Fabrički opozivi

Post od grujicd » 06 Apr 2016, 07:12

BMW nema žmigavce :mrkezo:

Korisnikov avatar
Delija
Postovi: 17923
Pridružio se: 13 Jan 2012, 08:48
Garaža: plava munja
Lokacija: NS
Kontakt:

Re: Fabrički opozivi

Post od Delija » 06 Apr 2016, 09:59

Kad dam zmigavac ljudi misle da ih zajebavam :D
Bahati vozac BMW-a

Korisnikov avatar
Geza
Moderator
Postovi: 31075
Pridružio se: 06 Jan 2012, 11:49
Lokacija: Apsurdistan

Re: Fabrički opozivi

Post od Geza » 09 Sep 2016, 21:07

Mazda recalls 2010-2013 Mazda3, 2012-2015 Mazda5, 2013-2016 CX-5, 2016 CX-3: 2.2 million affected
http://www.thecarconnection.com/news/11 ... n-affected

Mazda reports that it plans to recall some 2.2 million vehicles to address a problem with their rear hatches. Roughly one-third of the affected vehicles are registered in North America

The recall stems from corrosion affecting the hatch lift supports. Mazda reports that the protective coating applied to the supports at the factory wasn't adequate to protect them from water intrusion.

Though water in the supports would be bad enough, the corrosive effect will be magnified if that water contains road salts, like the kind used for de-icing in some parts of the country. If the corrosion is severe enough, the supports can break, potentially injuring anyone standing below. To date, however, Mazda says that it's received no reports of injuries.

The recall affects the following models:
2016 Mazda CX-3
2013-2016 Mazda CX-5
2010-2013 Mazda Mazda3
2012-2015 Mazda Mazda5

Mazda says that the recall includes over 759,000 vehicles in the U.S. and Canada.
Najgore je svađati se sa budalom. Prvo te spusti na svoj nivo, a onda te dotuče iskustvom...
Slika Slika

Korisnikov avatar
Delija
Postovi: 17923
Pridružio se: 13 Jan 2012, 08:48
Garaža: plava munja
Lokacija: NS
Kontakt:

Re: Fabrički opozivi

Post od Delija » 09 Sep 2016, 21:28

Pa koliko oni uopste imaju prodatih vozila? :)
Bahati vozac BMW-a

Korisnikov avatar
Heinz
Postovi: 14406
Pridružio se: 12 Mar 2012, 19:27
Garaža: Civic FK2 1.8
Lokacija: Voždovac

Re: Fabrički opozivi

Post od Heinz » 10 Sep 2016, 01:15

Mazda i korozija, ništa novo.

Korisnikov avatar
dragvorl
Site Admin
Postovi: 18553
Pridružio se: 06 Jan 2012, 13:03
Garaža: Fiat Stilo 1.9 MJ
Lokacija: NS
Kontakt:

Re: Fabrički opozivi

Post od dragvorl » 18 Feb 2017, 22:26

SlikaSlika
Mauro Forghieri:"Power comes from speed, torque without speed is nothing"
Life is funny, skies are sunny, Bees make honey, who needs money

Odgovori