GARAŽA forum

Ja sam bio poslovno, ali tako je, do 30 dana po ulasku, kao i Rusija i Gruzija. Dovoljno je da se čekiraš na najbližem graničnom prelazu i imaš još 30. Neobična zemlja.

Tapatalk HD

Boeing suspendovao isporuke 787:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-21095056

Dreamliner crisis: Boeing halts 787 jet deliveries
Boeing has suspended deliveries of its new 787 Dreamliner aircraft until a battery problem is resolved.

Odlican tekst o 787 i marketing gimmicku Boeinga

http://blogs.crikey.com.au/planetalking ... media-too/

"The roll out of the shell of a 787 in July 2007 that was purported to be the prototype that would fly by the end of September that year and be certified by late May 2008 was a willful, orchestrated and totally deceitful lie.

As were the persistent claims that the jet could be finally assembled in three days from components flown or shipped to the final assembly line at Everett, after being variously glued together and baked in giant autoclaves or industrial ovens.

No jet airliner in history has ever been lied about for longer. It was a total triumph of spin over realities, and in the process Boeing dumbed down its work force, to the point where workers weren’t even putting the right rivets into the right holes. When it outsourced design and risk and reward to a wide range of offshore suppliers, it actually murdered the Boeing that had made the 777, the 747 and, back at the beginning of the commercial jet age, the 707s and 727s.

The only reasonable conclusion that can be made from this sorry and infuriating history of totally misleading and inaccurate announcements is that Boeing deliberately and persistently lied about the program.

If it wasn’t lying, then it had absolutely no idea what was going on in the project. Those lies were by and large, circulated by a compromised aviation media that made the reporters that adulated Lance Armstrong through seven Tours de France and beyond look like tough old school investigative journalists instead of the fools they are shown to be today."

Ja da dodam. Ne zivi se od stare slave.

Kako mali Djokica zamislja Jat

Kvar akumulatora



Radi se o problemima električnog sistema aviona. I to preciznije o litijum-jonskim električnim akumulatorima koje se široko koriste na ovom avionu. Pokazalo se u dva slučaja koji su poznati javnosti da su ovakvi akumulatori izazvali požar u avionu. Oba požara su se dogodila na avionima japanskih prevoznika, jedan slučaj se desio na zemlji a drugi u letu i avion je hitno prizemljen.

Boing 787 ima više ovakih akumulatora iz razloga što je to avion na kome je prvi put dosta sistema, koji su na prošloj generaciji aviona bili ne-električni sada električno. Mislilo se da će to doneti uštedu energije i smanjenje težine aviona. Dodatak tome je tehnolgija litijum-jonskih akumulatora koji se koriste umesto nikl-kadmijumskih akumulatora. Litijim-jonski akumulatori su u osnovi svih malih prenosnih uredjaja koje imate pored sebe ili koje biste želeli da imate: svi novi mobilni telefoni, svi ajped uredjaji, svi tableti, većina MP3 plejera, prenosni računari, itd.

Zbog čega su ove baterije toliko popularne da bi se, ovog puta u obliku akumulatora, koristile i na avionima? Odgovor je u gustini energije koje oni mogu da drže. Ovi akumulatori mogu da skladište mnogo puta više energije nego akumulator u vašem automobilu ili na prošlim generacijama aviona. Ali poznati problem je nestabilnost. Dodatni problem je da na avionima ne postoji dovoljno iskustva u njihovom dugogodišnjem korišćenju. Iako možemo pretpostaviti da su proizvođači ovih akumulatora prošli kroz rigorozan proces testiranja svojih proizvoda, nešto se izgleda previdelo ili možda testovi nisu bili takvi da do detalja predstave uslove u avionu u letu.

deob text-a preuzet sa tangosixbloga

The Associated Press


WASHINGTON, DC -- It's likely that burning lithium ion batteries on two Boeing 787 Dreamliners were caused by overcharging, aviation safety and battery experts said, pointing to developments in the investigation of the Boeing incidents as well as a battery fire in a business jet more than a year ago.


An investigator in Japan, where a 787 made an emergency landing earlier this week, said Friday the charred insides of the plane's lithium ion battery show the battery received voltage in excess of its design limits.


The similarity of the burned battery from the All Nippon Airways flight to the burned battery in a Japan Airlines 787 that caught fire Jan. 7 while the jet was parked at Boston's Logan International Airport suggests a common cause, Japan transport ministry investigator Hideyo Kosugi said.


"If we compare data from the latest case here and that in the U.S., we can pretty much figure out what happened," Kosugi said.


In the case of the 787 in Boston, the battery in the plane's auxiliary power unit had recently received a large demand on its power and was in the process of charging when the fire ignited, a source familiar with the investigation of the 787 fire in Boston told The Associated Press. The plane had landed a short time earlier and was empty of passengers, although a cleaning crew was working in the plane.

I malo o Jat Airways (foto-tura)

Jbt. ova persida mi je bila kada sam isao za Barsu

I odmah si vadio aparat???

E, BAJKERU. BAJKERU

Fetis je fetis

sent from my phone using the fingers

zuzazu napisao:I odmah si vadio aparat???

E, BAJKERU. BAJKERU

Crko bi mi istog casa aparat

Vidim da je nisi zaboravio. Budis li se u znoju?

Ma jok, imam miran san Samo sto pamtim face jbf fotografsko pamcenje

"Drimlajner" - šamar od 5 mlrd. $
IZVOR: TANJUG
Njujork -- Analitičari procenjuju da kompanija Boing rizikuje da otpiše čak pet milijardi dolara od očekivanih prihoda.




Foto: Beta
Dok vazduhoplovne vlasti Japana i Sjedinjenih Američkih Država i dalje tragaju za uzrokom požara na avionima tipa Drimlajner, sve je izvesnije da će kompanije širom sveta otkazivati porudžbiine.

"U najgorem mogućem slučaju, problemi sa Drimlajnerom su kompleksni i Boing će morati da otpiše pet milijardi dolara od očekivanih prihoda" izjavio je analitičar iz kompanije Džeferis (Jefferies & Co), Hauard Rubel, precizirajući da je verovatnoća da se to desi četiri odsto, prenosi agencija Blumberg.

Konsultantska kuća Rubel procenjuje da će prizemljenje Drimlajnera koštati oko 550 miliona dolara, a spisak potencijalnih troškova je dugačak - od 125 miliona dolara naknade avio-kompanijama zbog prinudnog iznajmljivanja aviona, do otpisa očekivanih prihoda od pet milijardi dolara.

U konsultatskoj agenciji Sanford Bernštajn (Sanford C. Bernstein & Co.) su optimističniji, i procenjuju da će Boing platiti manje od 350 miliona evra.

Boing će 30. januara objaviti poslovne rezultate za 2012., a tog dana treba da izadje i sa finansijskom prognozom za ovu godinu, što u datim okolnostima nije izvodljivo.

Postoji više scenarija prevazilaženja nastale situacije, od brzog rešavanja problema zamenom nekoliko neispravnih delova na avionima, do sveobuhvatne istrage i fundamentalnih promena u dizajnu aviona.


izvor b92

http://www.b92.net/biz/vesti/svet.php?y ... _id=681536

veceras je linija etiopiana preko nas koja inace uvek ide dreamlinerom isla sa b777...

Bio bi im sada dobar i onaj stari B707 i DC-10 samo da se prevezu