GARAŽA forum

I've even made the effort and in the 3 ETKA 2.0 TDI with 81 kW, 103 kW and 125KW (CBDC, CBAB, CBBB) to compare. The following outcomes were achieved:

Identical are:

Connecting rods, pistons, piston rings, all bearings, oil spray nozzles

Cylinder head including valves, etc. (!), Timing belt set complete

Oil filter module, fuel filter, auxiliary water pump, radiator + dual fan, air filter, LMM

-Cr-pump, injection, injectors (!) Abgasrückfuhrung, vacuum pump

Turbo + manifold from 110PS = 140HP; (Btw all Turbos are available only with a manifold, if I have understood correctly .... so not cheap in case of damage)

-From MJ2010 identical intercoolers for all previously 110PS = 140HP with a different part no.


Differences:

-The 110 PS NEN other short block, crankshaft and oil pump, because it has not installed the balance shaft module (140 and 170 hp here completely identical)

-The clutch including flywheel is of course dependent torque designed

-170PS has ne other water pump + turbo + exhaust system


So looks as if the 81 kW motor from the brand "unbreakable". Would not surprise me if the Mercedes 190 diesel creates mileages. (Parts such as CR pump, injectors and turbo outside times left out) So really very solid engine what pistons and co. terms. Conversely, I am now but a few thoughts about the shelf life of my baby


When 1.6 TDI all parts are identical in 90 HP and 105 HP version, even the turbos.

Geza napisao:Nije fora u lakoći. Ako je obrtni moment prejak samleće ceo prenos.